header-logo header-logo

Proceeds of crime

14 December 2012
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Criminal , In Court
printer mail-detail

Executive Jet Support Ltd v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2012] EWHC 2737 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 40 (Dec)

Section 314(4) provided the test to determine whether it would be wrong to forfeit the recoverable property in the hands of an innocent party. The test was whether the innocent party’s consideration had become executed consideration; if it had not, then the innocent party would not be permitted to retain the proceeds of unlawful conduct which he had received but he would retain his consideration. If the innocent party’s consideration had become executed, the innocent party was permitted to retain the proceeds of unlawful conduct. Parliament intended that those applications could be made in summary proceedings. Parliament used language which was neither arcane nor obscure to define the circumstances in which recoverable property ceased to be recoverable. It followed that the protection to the innocent purchaser of the value was only provided when the contract has been completed and issues of economic loss on the part of the innocent purchaser were irrelevant.

Section 314(4) had to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll