header-logo header-logo

14 December 2012
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Criminal , In Court
printer mail-detail

Proceeds of crime

Executive Jet Support Ltd v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2012] EWHC 2737 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 40 (Dec)

Section 314(4) provided the test to determine whether it would be wrong to forfeit the recoverable property in the hands of an innocent party. The test was whether the innocent party’s consideration had become executed consideration; if it had not, then the innocent party would not be permitted to retain the proceeds of unlawful conduct which he had received but he would retain his consideration. If the innocent party’s consideration had become executed, the innocent party was permitted to retain the proceeds of unlawful conduct. Parliament intended that those applications could be made in summary proceedings. Parliament used language which was neither arcane nor obscure to define the circumstances in which recoverable property ceased to be recoverable. It followed that the protection to the innocent purchaser of the value was only provided when the contract has been completed and issues of economic loss on the part of the innocent purchaser were irrelevant.

Section 314(4) had to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll