header-logo header-logo

14 December 2012
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Criminal , In Court
printer mail-detail

Proceeds of crime

Executive Jet Support Ltd v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2012] EWHC 2737 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 40 (Dec)

Section 314(4) provided the test to determine whether it would be wrong to forfeit the recoverable property in the hands of an innocent party. The test was whether the innocent party’s consideration had become executed consideration; if it had not, then the innocent party would not be permitted to retain the proceeds of unlawful conduct which he had received but he would retain his consideration. If the innocent party’s consideration had become executed, the innocent party was permitted to retain the proceeds of unlawful conduct. Parliament intended that those applications could be made in summary proceedings. Parliament used language which was neither arcane nor obscure to define the circumstances in which recoverable property ceased to be recoverable. It followed that the protection to the innocent purchaser of the value was only provided when the contract has been completed and issues of economic loss on the part of the innocent purchaser were irrelevant.

Section 314(4) had to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll