header-logo header-logo

Proceeds of crime

14 December 2012
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Criminal , In Court
printer mail-detail

Executive Jet Support Ltd v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2012] EWHC 2737 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 40 (Dec)

Section 314(4) provided the test to determine whether it would be wrong to forfeit the recoverable property in the hands of an innocent party. The test was whether the innocent party’s consideration had become executed consideration; if it had not, then the innocent party would not be permitted to retain the proceeds of unlawful conduct which he had received but he would retain his consideration. If the innocent party’s consideration had become executed, the innocent party was permitted to retain the proceeds of unlawful conduct. Parliament intended that those applications could be made in summary proceedings. Parliament used language which was neither arcane nor obscure to define the circumstances in which recoverable property ceased to be recoverable. It followed that the protection to the innocent purchaser of the value was only provided when the contract has been completed and issues of economic loss on the part of the innocent purchaser were irrelevant.

Section 314(4) had to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll