header-logo header-logo

Procurement challenge

18 June 2009
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Commercial

A local authority is liable for damages for abandoning a procurement process in favour of an associated company, the Court of Appeal has held, in a case which is likely to encourage more legal challenges from bidders.
In Risk Management Partners Ltd v Council of the London Borough of Brent & Ors, Brent had started a procurement process, in which Risk Management (RMP) had made the most financially advantageous bid. However, Brent abandoned the process and awarded the contract to London Authorities Mutual Ltd, of which Brent was a participating member.

RMP sued on the basis Brent had infringed the Public Contracts Regulations 2006. Brent accepted this but argued in-house awards were exempt from the regulations, on the basis of Teckal SrL v Comune di Viano [1999].
The Court of Appeal interpreted the in-house exemption strictly, ruling in favour of RMP.

Catherine Wolfenden, senior associate, Osborne Clarke, says: “This is a rare example of the court holding a public body liable for damages under the current procurement rules. 

“However, the UK is due to implement the new Remedies Directive by the end of this year. This will significantly strengthen the powers of the courts where a public authority breaches the Regulations, and is likely to make this sort of decision much more common.  

“The recovery of damages by RMP in this case should encourage disgruntled bidders to bring complaints before the courts where the procurement rules have been infringed.”

Issue: 7374 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll