header-logo header-logo

06 May 2022 / Sarah Moore , Stuart Warmington , Alexandre Predal
Issue: 7977 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Product liability: more David, less Goliath?

80831
Is there hope on the horizon for product liability claimant lawyers? Sarah Moore, Alexandre Predal & Stuart Warmington examine some promising developments
  • Recent rulings in product liability group actions in both the Netherlands and France may provide hope for greater resource efficiencies for claimants facing deep-pocketed defendants.

With recent rulings in France, litigation afoot in the Netherlands, and obiter comments in the Lloyd v Google decision, there may well be reason to hope that the David vs Goliath dynamic that has defined the EU product liability landscape for the last 20 years is in flux, perhaps promising a brighter future for Big Pharma accountability across the EU and the UK. This article looks briefly at those ‘points of light’.

First some background: briefly put, the facts are as follows—the Product Liability Directive (Council Directive 85/374/EEC) (PLD) emerged newly minted from the European legislature in 1985 and was thereafter adopted into the domestic laws of all EU nations; in the UK, in the form of the Consumer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll