header-logo header-logo

Professional liability predictions 2024

23 January 2024
Issue: 8056 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
‘Deep pocket’ professional indemnity claims could ‘re-emerge’ this year due to economic ‘headwinds’, according to DAC Beachcroft’s ‘Informed insurance’ predictions for 2024

‘Deep pocket’ professional indemnity claims could ‘re-emerge’ this year due to economic ‘headwinds’, according to DAC Beachcroft’s ‘Informed insurance’ predictions for 2024

The potential is ‘real’ due to ‘the highest quarterly insolvency numbers since Q2 2009’ when the last economic downturn was at its peak combined with an ‘apparent slowing in the real estate sector’ and consequent defaults, climate change risks, sustainability demands from clients, and concerns about cyber risks.

The firm’s insurance specialists also warn it is ‘likely that claims will be made against solicitors arising from new requirements under the Building Safety Act 2022’, regarding cladding and fire-related remediation work. Conveyancers who mistakenly identify a property as protected when it’s not could be caught out. DAC says: ‘The risk for solicitors is checking whether the information provided is accurate.

‘Solicitors acting for sellers may be put under pressure to sign undertakings, pursuant to which strict liability for errors would result—something to be avoided!’

Another cause of professional negligence claims is ‘the lack of clarity around the threshold for improper conduct’ regarding Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAPPs).

DAC recommends firms and in-house teams ‘upskill’ their climate-related advice or else face increasing claims in this area. It suggests not only extra training for solicitors in this area but also ensuring clients are clear about the ‘limits of the advice they will receive and when they may need to instruct a specialist’.

Also lurking in the undergrowth for solicitors this year is generative artificial intelligence (AI), which will ‘fundamentally alter the practice of law’ but also bring ‘the prospect of claims’. The risk of ‘hallucinations’ where AI invents content means lawyers must verify all content, and there are further risks such as breach of confidentiality, intellectual property infringement, breaches of cybersecurity and privacy laws and publication of defamatory content.

View more at: https://insurance.dacbeachcroft.com/predictions/professional-liability.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll