header-logo header-logo

15 September 2020
Issue: 7902 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Promises on prison fall short

The Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) ‘naïve’ approach to outsourcing has come under fire, in a scathing report by the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC)
The report, ‘Improving the prison estate’, published last week, found that, despite promises to create 10,000 new-for-old prison places by 2020 under the Prison Estate Transformation Programme, only 206 have been delivered so far, while a ‘staggering’ £900m backlog of maintenance work has been allowed to build up, causing 500 prison places to be taken out of action permanently each year.

It noted that prisoners are being held in unsafe, crowded conditions. Moreover, giving evidence to PAC about the female prison estate, the MoJ was ‘unable to answer basic questions’ or ‘demonstrate that conditions in these prisons are adequate for the needs and safety of prisoners’.

According to PAC, ‘the Ministry has once again exposed taxpayers to higher than expected costs as a result of inadequate planning, unrealistic assumptions and poor performance while managing facilities within prisons’. It predicted demand for prison places could outstrip supply by 2022-23.

Meg Hillier MP, chair of PAC, called on ministers to produce ‘a credible new plan’.

An MoJ spokesperson said: ‘We are investing £2.75bn to modernise the prison estate and deliver 10,000 new prison places―strengthening security and boosting rehabilitation.

‘Work is already underway on two modern prisons at Glen Parva and Wellingborough which will create 3,360 new places over the next three years. We also want to see fewer women go to prison in the first place, which is why we have invested in community services that support vulnerable offenders to turn their lives around and are trialling Residential Women’s Centres as an alternative to custody.’

On maintenance, the MoJ spokesperson highlighted that contractor performance had improved over the past year and was being ‘robustly monitored’.

View the report at: https://bit.ly/32q9ufs.

 

Issue: 7902 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll