header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
29 July 2020 / Philip Sissons
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Property
printer mail-detail

Property law & the COVID-19 pandemic (Pt 2)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
25148
The use and occupation of property and performance of property contracts Phil Sissons

Introduction

Beyond the obligations of a tenant to continue to pay rent and service charges (see Pt 1, ‘Property law & the COVID-19 pandemic’, NLJ, 10 July 2020, p20) the lockdown restrictions give rise to a second major group of loosely related issues around the use and occupation of property.

Keep open covenants

Some commercial leases (particularly, for example, leases of retail units in a shopping centre) contain clauses which oblige the tenant to open for business, usually during specified hours. Can those clauses be enforced when the tenant ceases trading due to the pandemic? In most cases the answer seems clear. If the 2020 Regulations have compelled the closure of the business this would provide a defence to a claim for non-compliance with the covenant. (For more detailed treatment of the issue of keep open covenants see ‘(Still) open all hours? Tenants’ covenants to keep business premises open and to pay rent during

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll