header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Property law update

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
02 March 2007 / Tamsin Cox , Edward Peters KC
Issue: 7262 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Landlords' obligations under DDA 1995, Statutory protection of tenants, Adverse possession

DISCRIMINATING LANDLORDS

The Court of Appeal in Richmond Court (Swansea) Ltd v Williams [2006] EWCA Civ 1719. [2006] All ER (D) 218 (Dec) has provided welcome guidance about the test to be applied when considering whether a landlord has discriminated against a tenant on the basis of disability, contrary to the provisions of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995).

Dorothy Williams was the underlessee of a third floor flat. Her flat was reached by a common staircase, which her lease granted her an easement to use. However, at the age of 81 she was suffering from mobility problems. She could use the stairs only with the greatest difficulty, and needed a stairlift.

The local authority was prepared to pay for the installation of a stairlift, but the headlessee of the block refused to allow it to be installed. Williams claimed that, by refusing its consent, the headlessee was discriminating against her contrary to DDA 1995, s 22(3), and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Law Society calls for clarity on AML
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Turning corporate liability into opportunity
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
NLJ this week: A prince no more?
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
NLJ this week: Shareholder secrecy sunk
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
NLJ this week: The expanding remit of national security law
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll