header-logo header-logo

Protecting the pot

12 October 2012 / Jane Wolstenholme
Issue: 7533 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

How safe are pensions in bankruptcy, asks Jane Wolstenholme

The rights of an individual under either an occupational pension scheme or a personal pension arrangement often constitute an individual’s most significant asset after his or her house. Where an individual is declared bankrupt, the trustee in bankruptcy (TIB) will be keen to realise all the individual’s assets, including any value in the pension scheme, in order to satisfy those debts. However, there are strong public policy arguments in favour of protecting pension rights even for an insolvent individual. This is to encourage retirement savings at a level sufficient to ensure that the individual will not be left destitute in old age, when unable to earn an income, and therefore be reliant on the state. Conversely, it is not in the interests of creditors to allow individuals to use pension arrangements to put their wealth out of the reach of those creditors. The competing public policy pressures in this area have therefore led to sometimes difficult shifts in the attitude of the courts and legislators on how

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll