header-logo header-logo

Protecting the pot

12 October 2012 / Jane Wolstenholme
Issue: 7533 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

How safe are pensions in bankruptcy, asks Jane Wolstenholme

The rights of an individual under either an occupational pension scheme or a personal pension arrangement often constitute an individual’s most significant asset after his or her house. Where an individual is declared bankrupt, the trustee in bankruptcy (TIB) will be keen to realise all the individual’s assets, including any value in the pension scheme, in order to satisfy those debts. However, there are strong public policy arguments in favour of protecting pension rights even for an insolvent individual. This is to encourage retirement savings at a level sufficient to ensure that the individual will not be left destitute in old age, when unable to earn an income, and therefore be reliant on the state. Conversely, it is not in the interests of creditors to allow individuals to use pension arrangements to put their wealth out of the reach of those creditors. The competing public policy pressures in this area have therefore led to sometimes difficult shifts in the attitude of the courts and legislators on how

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll