header-logo header-logo

12 October 2012 / Jane Wolstenholme
Issue: 7533 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Protecting the pot

How safe are pensions in bankruptcy, asks Jane Wolstenholme

The rights of an individual under either an occupational pension scheme or a personal pension arrangement often constitute an individual’s most significant asset after his or her house. Where an individual is declared bankrupt, the trustee in bankruptcy (TIB) will be keen to realise all the individual’s assets, including any value in the pension scheme, in order to satisfy those debts. However, there are strong public policy arguments in favour of protecting pension rights even for an insolvent individual. This is to encourage retirement savings at a level sufficient to ensure that the individual will not be left destitute in old age, when unable to earn an income, and therefore be reliant on the state. Conversely, it is not in the interests of creditors to allow individuals to use pension arrangements to put their wealth out of the reach of those creditors. The competing public policy pressures in this area have therefore led to sometimes difficult shifts in the attitude of the courts and legislators on how

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll