header-logo header-logo

02 July 2009
Issue: 7376 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Public baffled by privacy notices

Code of practice highlights best (and worst) practices in data privacy

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has called for an overhaul of privacy notices that leave consumers baffled by unnecessary legalese.
Consumer research by the ICO shows that half of consumers don’t understand what they’re signing up to when they fill in online and paper forms. The ICO launched a privacy notices code of practice in June to help organisations provide more user-friendly privacy and marketing notices.
Privacy notices are the oral or written statements that individuals are given when information is collected about them, and explains who is collecting the information, what is going to be done with it, and who it will be shared with. The privacy notice can go beyond this, for example, by explaining access rights and rights of complaint.

Tom Morrison, associate, Rollits, says: “In an attempt to comply with the law some organisations have lost sight of the primary purpose of a privacy notice; to enable individuals to ascertain how their personal information will be handled, rather than to tick a box saying that a section of the Data Protection Act 1998 has been complied with. 

“The effectiveness of a privacy notice is generally inversely proportionate to its length and complexity. As notices get more detailed the ability to get through to the key points becomes increasingly difficult, and it has reached the stage where individuals can no longer see at a glance how their information will be handled.

“This has been identified as a particular issue over recent years, which led the Article 29 Working Party, a group which co-ordinates the approach taken by information commissioners throughout Europe, to propose a code of practice. It is out of this that the UK’s information commissioner pushed for a code highlighting what he considers to be best—and worst—practice. 

“The code is no substitute for taking sound legal advice and has no legal effect in itself, but it is certainly a positive development and a tool which should have an impact on the approach organisations take to designing comprehensive but easy to understand privacy notices.”

Chris Graham, the former director general of the Advertising Standards Authority, took over from outgoing information commissioner, Richard Thomas, in June.

Issue: 7376 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll