header-logo header-logo

19 May 2023 / Malcolm Bishop KC
Issue: 8025 / Categories: Features , Inquests , Public
printer mail-detail

Public inquiries: back in fashion?

122298
Public inquiries—getting at the truth or kicking the can down the road? Malcolm Bishop KC hovers between optimism & cynicism

We all remember the date—it was 1066 and the Battle of Hastings when an arrow pierced the eye of Harold Godwinson, and William the Conqueror claimed the throne of England. Having seized his kingdom, this Norman adventurer had to find out what he was reigning over, because unless he knew that, he could not indulge the habit of every ruler of that time or this—taxing the populace. The result was the Domesday Book, an extensive inquiry into the wealth of his new realm. The first public inquiry! And it has flourished ever since.

Whether its purpose was to glean genuine information on a subject of national importance, such as the reform of the assizes system under Lord Beeching in the 1970s, or to kick a controversial subject into the long grass, as in the Iraq Inquiry, is open to debate. But this useful mechanism for bequeathing a ‘hot potato’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll