header-logo header-logo

Public interest test for homicide updated

11 October 2023
Issue: 8044 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has updated its guidance for prosecutors on the public interest considerations when dealing with ‘mercy killings’ and failed suicide pacts

It published its revised prosecution guidance on homicide last week, following a 12-week consultation. The guidance, which covers a range of homicide offences, contains amendments to the public interest factors in ‘mercy killings’.

Factors in favour of prosecution are that the suspect influenced the victim not to seek medical treatment, palliative care or independent professional advice or denied access to such. If the suspect was acting in their capacity as a medical doctor, nurse or other healthcare professional and the victim was in their care, this also points in favour of prosecution.

There are six public interest factors tending against prosecution, however, including if the victim had, free of coercion or pressure, ‘reached a voluntary, clear, settled and informed decision that they wished for their life to end’, or if the actions of the suspect ‘may be characterised as reluctant, in the face of significant emotional pressure due to the victim’s wish for their life to end’.

Other factors making prosecution less likely are that the victim was physically unable to end their own life, the suspect made a genuine attempt to take their own life at the same time, the suspect was motivated by compassion alone, and the suspect reported the death to the police and fully assisted in their enquiries.

The CPS guidance points out that nothing in the guidance decriminalises the offences of murder, manslaughter or attempted murder. ‘Nor does it amount to an assurance that a person will be immune from prosecution if he or she does an act that ends the life of another person,’ it states.

The homicide guidance does not cover ‘assisted dying’.

Director of Public Prosecutions Max Hill KC said: ‘A prosecution will usually take place unless the prosecutor is satisfied that there are public interest factors tending against prosecution which outweigh those tending in favour.

‘Prosecutors must decide the importance of each public interest factor in the circumstances of each case and go on to make an overall assessment.’

Read the full guidance here.

Issue: 8044 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll