header-logo header-logo

03 July 2008 / Joe Middleton , Mark Henderson
Issue: 7328 / Categories: Features , Public , Employment
printer mail-detail

Public law update

HIghly skilled migrant programme
Expulsion

LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION
In a series of recent cases the courts have grappled with issues of legitimate expectation as they relate to people granted leave to live and work in the UK under the highly skilled migrant programme (HSMP). These migrants are by definition exceptionally well qualified and make a valuable contribution to the UK. Their problem has been that, having been encouraged to come here on a programme leading to settlement (permanent residence), the rules of the programme and their eligibility for employment were suddenly changed and they found themselves facing the prospect of having to leave the country.

AA and HSMP Forum
The first pair of cases arise from changes to the HSMP criteria in November 2006. These meant that many of those already on the programme who had expected to be able to settle in the UK in due course, suddenly became ineligible for any extension of leave. The appellants in AA (Pakistan) [2008] UKAIT 00003 (21 December 2007) had originally applied for HSMP status

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll