header-logo header-logo

19 July 2018 / Jonathan Goodliffe
Issue: 7802 / Categories: Features , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Putting the cat among the pigeons

nlj_7802_backpage

What can be done when the family pets get in the way of your relationship? A tale of feline hijinks, by Jonathan Goodliffe

An increasing number of family disputes now involve issues as to the custody and ownership of a cat or cats, especially when there are no children and the cat is in effect a child substitute for one or both parents.

Why cats and not dogs? According to a study published by the Institute of Advanced Feline Studies, humans tend to bond in the most profound way with cats, of all animals. Being parted from one’s cat as a result of a divorce can therefore be traumatic.

One cat dispute has now reached the Court of Appeal ( Andrews v Andrews [2018] EWCA 123) and the judgment of Lady Justice Green, summarised below, has clarified this difficult area of the law.

The married couple

The case concerned Rex and Mary Andrews. Rex was a corporate solicitor. He thought he was better than Mary because he earned more than she

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll