header-logo header-logo

19 July 2018 / Jonathan Goodliffe
Issue: 7802 / Categories: Features , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Putting the cat among the pigeons

nlj_7802_backpage

What can be done when the family pets get in the way of your relationship? A tale of feline hijinks, by Jonathan Goodliffe

An increasing number of family disputes now involve issues as to the custody and ownership of a cat or cats, especially when there are no children and the cat is in effect a child substitute for one or both parents.

Why cats and not dogs? According to a study published by the Institute of Advanced Feline Studies, humans tend to bond in the most profound way with cats, of all animals. Being parted from one’s cat as a result of a divorce can therefore be traumatic.

One cat dispute has now reached the Court of Appeal ( Andrews v Andrews [2018] EWCA 123) and the judgment of Lady Justice Green, summarised below, has clarified this difficult area of the law.

The married couple

The case concerned Rex and Mary Andrews. Rex was a corporate solicitor. He thought he was better than Mary because he earned more than she

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll