header-logo header-logo

Question of fact appeals: paranoia, puzzles & island-hopping

22 July 2022 / Marc Thorley
Issue: 7988 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail
88161
Marc Thorley investigates appeals on questions of fact
  • Recent decision in Volpi & Delta Limited v Volpi set out principles to be applied on questions of fact appeals.
  • A look back at Lewison LJ’s findings in Fage UK Ltd and Another v Chobani UK Ltd and Another.

Appeals on pure questions of fact have long been disliked by the appeal courts. In its recent decision in Volpi & Delta Limited v Volpi [2022] EWCA Civ 464, the Court of Appeal has set out clearly the principles to be applied on such appeals. It has issued a warning to those who ‘island hop’ by focusing their appeals on their preferred select extracts of (supposedly misjudged) evidence, rather than dealing with the entire sea of evidence available to the trial judge.

Facts

The case was about whether CHF (Swiss Francs) 6m advanced by a father, through a company controlled by him, to his son, was a loan or a gift. The moneys were for the purchase

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll