header-logo header-logo

04 August 2011 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Question time

What limits should be placed on cross-examination, asks Geoffrey Bindman

It is impossible not to feel sympathy for the parents of the murdered teenager Milly Dowler in their complaints of distress at their cross-examination at the trial of their daughter’s killer. Aggressive and callous treatment of such witnesses by advocates can never be justified. Evidently the Dowlers felt it as such, whatever may have been intended.

Advocates

There are serious questions about the role and conduct of advocates in our courts. On the one hand the advocate must be able to ask any question and put forward any argument that his client would be entitled to do. The lawyer’s job is to present the case of the defendant with skill and clarity, not to censor the defence.

On the other hand, the lawyer must observe professional standards which do not apply to the lay client.

Some years ago I was a witness at a costs hearing following a lengthy libel trial where I was solicitor for the successful plaintiff. The defendant, a national

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll