header-logo header-logo

14 December 2012 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Question time

Mark Solon speaks to the experts

Over a third of expert witnesses believe that the reforms proposed by Lord Justice Jackson in his 2010 report will lead to injustices according to Bond Solon’s latest expert witness survey.

Of the 320 expert witnesses who attended Bond Solon’s annual expert witness conference last month, 146 returned their views on the latest legal developments. These include the impact of the reforms on their fees and the number of instructions they receive, as well as the success of cost cutting initiatives such as concurrent evidence in court (or hot tubbing).

Fees

The Jackson reforms recommend a number of measures to curb the rising cost of litigation. However, asked whether cost management—a central tenet of the reforms under which the parties draft a budget for each stage of the proceedings—will lead to a cut in their fees, over a third of experts (36%) said no. Only 27% of experts believe the new provisions will lead to a reduction in their fees and 32% are still undecided. The remaining

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll