header-logo header-logo

13 December 2018 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7821 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Technology
printer mail-detail

A race against time?

With smaller firms still dragging their feet when it comes to new technology, Roger Smith provides a word of warning: keep looking over your shoulder

A recent American Bar Association (ABA) study raises the question of the extent to which smaller legal practices (and, by implication, those serving poorer clients) are using technology. Small firms are just not adopting technology in the headlong way that larger ones are—particularly those in the commercial sector. Is a split emerging between commercial and consumer firms over their adaption to technology? And what should small firms do?

Reshaping the sector

The US study found that small firms had adapted to remote access so that lawyers could work outside the office (available to 84% of respondents); they were settling on Windows as the operating system of choice (up from 46% to 59% in a year); pretty well everyone was using email; and 60% held records on the cloud, 13% of whom may well be heading for a fall because they take no additional security precautions. Tablets were on the march,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll