header-logo header-logo

13 December 2018 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7821 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Technology
printer mail-detail

A race against time?

With smaller firms still dragging their feet when it comes to new technology, Roger Smith provides a word of warning: keep looking over your shoulder

A recent American Bar Association (ABA) study raises the question of the extent to which smaller legal practices (and, by implication, those serving poorer clients) are using technology. Small firms are just not adopting technology in the headlong way that larger ones are—particularly those in the commercial sector. Is a split emerging between commercial and consumer firms over their adaption to technology? And what should small firms do?

Reshaping the sector

The US study found that small firms had adapted to remote access so that lawyers could work outside the office (available to 84% of respondents); they were settling on Windows as the operating system of choice (up from 46% to 59% in a year); pretty well everyone was using email; and 60% held records on the cloud, 13% of whom may well be heading for a fall because they take no additional security precautions. Tablets were on the march,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll