header-logo header-logo

13 December 2018 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7821 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Technology
printer mail-detail

A race against time?

With smaller firms still dragging their feet when it comes to new technology, Roger Smith provides a word of warning: keep looking over your shoulder

A recent American Bar Association (ABA) study raises the question of the extent to which smaller legal practices (and, by implication, those serving poorer clients) are using technology. Small firms are just not adopting technology in the headlong way that larger ones are—particularly those in the commercial sector. Is a split emerging between commercial and consumer firms over their adaption to technology? And what should small firms do?

Reshaping the sector

The US study found that small firms had adapted to remote access so that lawyers could work outside the office (available to 84% of respondents); they were settling on Windows as the operating system of choice (up from 46% to 59% in a year); pretty well everyone was using email; and 60% held records on the cloud, 13% of whom may well be heading for a fall because they take no additional security precautions. Tablets were on the march,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll