header-logo header-logo

10 December 2015
Issue: 7680 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A race relations half-century

Fifty years on from the Race Relations Act 1965, can we say that anti-discrimination law has worked well? Geoffrey Bindman QC, who served as the Race Relations Board’s legal adviser for the whole of its 10-year existence, assesses the effectiveness of anti-discrimination law and the choices that were made in its introduction, in an article in this week’s NLJ. The 1965 Act imposed civil rather than criminal sanctions since the introductions of criminal sanctions in the US was judged to have failed. However the British version was “narrow in scope and the sanctions were weak”. Legislation requires enforcement, he writes, and while equality has improved there is still some way to go.

Issue: 7680 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll