header-logo header-logo

Reading, writing… hold the arithmetic

05 May 2021 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7931 / Categories: Features , Costs , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
48180
Numerical nightmares & conjured-up counterclaims: Dominic Regan counts the costs of some headline headaches

Many an innumerate lawyer will admit that they chose their profession—or it chose them—because they were terrified of accountancy. Nevertheless, numbers big and small are the stock in trade of law. What follows are the numbers that have caught my eye over the years.

£453,576,152 was awarded to Mrs Akhmedova in December 2016, following her divorce from a Russian oligarch. He has not paid up, and we have just seen the claimant secure an award of £75m against her son, who was found to have helped his father put assets beyond the reach of his mother (Akhmedova v Akhmedov and others [2021] EWHC 545 (Fam)).

£104,707,772.72 was largest ever known bill of costs and the subject of appeal in Motto v Trafigura Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1150, [2011] All ER (D) 138 (Oct). Lord Neuberger, then Master of the Rolls, noted at para [26] of the judgment that the defendant was ‘dismayed’ to be presented

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll