header-logo header-logo

22 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Bar Council , Legal News
printer mail-detail

Realism at the Bar

Only 37-39% of Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) graduates go on to pupillage, Bar Standards Board figures show.

BPTC fees can be as high as £19,000 for the year.

Bar Chair, Andrew Langdon QC said: ‘We have been supporting the work of the Inns of Court in developing a less expensive model of training, splitting the course into two parts so that only those with a realistic chance of securing pupillage will continue with the course.

‘The nature of the Bar is that candidates must be prepared to achieve academic excellence and to compete, but we do not want students with a good chance of success to be put off by the cost. Those currently considering a career at the Bar will want to study these BPTC figures when weighing up their options.’

The figures revealed increasing diversity—for 2015-16, 19.7% of UK/EU graduates awarded pupillage were BME (black minority ethnic).

Issue: 7751 / Categories: Bar Council , Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll