header-logo header-logo

Rearing its ugly head

Victoria von Wachter analyses the complex principles of discrimination

The latest cases involving harassment on grounds of an illegal reason have come to court. The problem here is how loose must the connection be between the insult and the victim, before the thread of causation is broken.

The majority of the discrimination statutes or statutory instruments have provision for the outlawing of discrimination or harassment “on grounds of” whatever the prohibited reason is. The exception is disability which makes it unlawful to harass an individual “for a reason that relates to the disabled person’s disability”.

Harassment is defined as: “Unwanted conduct that has the purpose or effect of violating a person’s dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for the victim.” This is subject to a test of reasonableness but taking into account the perception of the victim. The judiciary has been exercised for some time on the extent to which “on grounds of” can be stretched to accommodate the cases that have been trotted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll