header-logo header-logo

14 October 2010
Issue: 7437 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Record settlement

A permanently paralysed girl has secured the highest ever court-approved settlement for a spinal cord injury after taking the unusual step of suing her mother.

EA, who is nine, will receive more than £12m in the settlement, partly as a lump sum and partly in annual payments. Mr Justice Eady approved the settlement in the High Court last week.

EA was a passenger in her mother’s car when it was in a collision with a Royal Mail delivery lorry in 2004. Following the issue of High Court proceedings, she secured interim payments of more than £1.5m from her mother’s insurers and was able to pay for a suitable bungalow in west London and a team of full-time carers.

She has now returned to mainstream schooling, but is paralysed and dependent on a ventilator to breathe.

Warren Collins, partner at Davies Arnold Cooper, who represented EA, says that even though this may be a very large settlement, it is by no means a “lottery win”.

“The money awarded simply relates to financial losses and future needs. The settlement will mean that EA no longer has to rely upon the state to fund her very expensive care and equipment needs. The damages assessed for her actual injuries are limited by law,” he adds.
For more on this see: www.newlawjournal.co.uk.

Issue: 7437 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll