header-logo header-logo

24 July 2008
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Profession
printer mail-detail

Redundancy risks

In brief

Employment experts are warning that firms that opt for “last in, first out” redundancy polices could be liable for indirect discrimination claims. Head of employment at EMW Law, Jon Taylor, says it is imperative that employers be aware of the relevant age discrimination provisions if they need to lose employees during the “credit crunch”. “It is questionable whether such a policy would stand up at a tribunal as economic factors alone may not be strong enough grounds to justify it and such a broad-brush approach may not be seen as proportionate,” he says. He suggests that younger claimants may say it is more cost-effective to retain their services due to low pay and greater potential for productivity.

Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP strengthens Commercial practice with a new partner

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons welcomes Francesca Brown to Family team

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau strengthens Sheffield regulatory practice with new hires

NEWS
A wide-ranging Civil Way column highlights developments from insolvency procedure to employment law, but one case stands out for its lessons on bankruptcy, family homes and digital communications
A sprawling Intellectual Property Office battle between House of Fraser and Frasers Property has delivered a masterclass in modern trade mark law
Courts in England and Wales and Singapore are increasingly confronting complex disputes over international child relocation as families become more globally mobile
The government’s long-awaited family law reform consultation could mark a turning point for domestic abuse victims navigating financial remedy proceedings, but significant challenges remain
A new commercial court pilot giving the public access to documents used in hearings, including expert reports, is raising difficult questions about transparency and privacy
back-to-top-scroll