header-logo header-logo

19 August 2016 / John McMullen
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail

The referendum effect

nlj_7713_mcmullen

John McMullen discusses TUPE & Brexit

  • Thoughts on the possible impact of Brexit on the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, which are underpinned by the EU Acquired Rights Directive 2001/23.

Much lawyers' ink will be spilt over the next two years speculating on the effect on UK employment laws of the decision in the 2016 referendum that the UK should leave the EU. Necessarily, speculating on the precise effect of this decision on those aspects of UK employment law which are based on an EU Treaty provision or EU directive is, at this juncture, premature. For a start, negotiations to leave the EU under the authority of Art 50 of the Treaty on European Union have, at the time of writing, not even been triggered.

The UK government has indicated this will not be before January 2017. When Art 50 is triggered it will take up to two years of negotiations before a settlement is achieved. Until then, as the EU Commission (along with the UK government),

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll