header-logo header-logo

The referendum effect

19 August 2016 / John McMullen
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7713_mcmullen

John McMullen discusses TUPE & Brexit

  • Thoughts on the possible impact of Brexit on the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, which are underpinned by the EU Acquired Rights Directive 2001/23.

Much lawyers' ink will be spilt over the next two years speculating on the effect on UK employment laws of the decision in the 2016 referendum that the UK should leave the EU. Necessarily, speculating on the precise effect of this decision on those aspects of UK employment law which are based on an EU Treaty provision or EU directive is, at this juncture, premature. For a start, negotiations to leave the EU under the authority of Art 50 of the Treaty on European Union have, at the time of writing, not even been triggered.

The UK government has indicated this will not be before January 2017. When Art 50 is triggered it will take up to two years of negotiations before a settlement is achieved. Until then, as the EU Commission (along with the UK government),

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll