header-logo header-logo

Referral fee caution

24 October 2013
Issue: 7581 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

SRA issues warning note on risky behaviour by PI lawyers

Personal injury lawyers have been cautioned against risky behaviour that could fall foul of the referral fees ban.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) fired out a warning note last week amid concerns that firms may be indulging in behaviour that flouts the 1 April ban. 

It also warned that it knows of “numerous” examples of firms complying with referral fees but potentially breaching other parts of the code of conduct.

According to the SRA, claims management companies have been asking firms to pay them a proportion of clients’ damages in return for a referral, or even to forward them the client’s damages, which may not be in the client’s best interests. 

Other potential breaches include arranging for clients to buy insurance reports or other products at inflated prices so the introducer receives a higher rate of commission, and not being sufficiently transparent about the arrangement.

Richard Collins, SRA executive director, says: “Worryingly, we are beginning to see some examples of firms that—in their desire to maintain a volume of new clients in a manner compliant with the referral fee ban—have not paid sufficient attention to compliance with the broader, and longstanding, regulatory requirements regarding referrals. We will take formal enforcement action.”

Deborah Evans, chief executive of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, says: “We’ve always believed a ban on referral fees would be difficult to enforce but, now that a ban is in place, it is the responsibility of solicitors to ensure they are not in breach of it, the responsibility of insurers and brokers to ensure they don’t profit from any breach, and the responsibility of the SRA to ensure it is enforced.”

The warning note can be read here.

Issue: 7581 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll