header-logo header-logo

24 October 2013
Issue: 7581 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Referral fee caution

SRA issues warning note on risky behaviour by PI lawyers

Personal injury lawyers have been cautioned against risky behaviour that could fall foul of the referral fees ban.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) fired out a warning note last week amid concerns that firms may be indulging in behaviour that flouts the 1 April ban. 

It also warned that it knows of “numerous” examples of firms complying with referral fees but potentially breaching other parts of the code of conduct.

According to the SRA, claims management companies have been asking firms to pay them a proportion of clients’ damages in return for a referral, or even to forward them the client’s damages, which may not be in the client’s best interests. 

Other potential breaches include arranging for clients to buy insurance reports or other products at inflated prices so the introducer receives a higher rate of commission, and not being sufficiently transparent about the arrangement.

Richard Collins, SRA executive director, says: “Worryingly, we are beginning to see some examples of firms that—in their desire to maintain a volume of new clients in a manner compliant with the referral fee ban—have not paid sufficient attention to compliance with the broader, and longstanding, regulatory requirements regarding referrals. We will take formal enforcement action.”

Deborah Evans, chief executive of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, says: “We’ve always believed a ban on referral fees would be difficult to enforce but, now that a ban is in place, it is the responsibility of solicitors to ensure they are not in breach of it, the responsibility of insurers and brokers to ensure they don’t profit from any breach, and the responsibility of the SRA to ensure it is enforced.”

The warning note can be read here.

Issue: 7581 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll