header-logo header-logo

Reforming surrogacy

14 June 2019 / Nick Hopkins
Issue: 7844 / Categories: Opinion , Family
printer mail-detail

Professor Nick Hopkins discusses the Law Commissions’ consultation on surrogacy & what happens next

Earlier this month, the Law Commission of England and Wales and the Scottish Law Commission published our joint consultation paper on reforming surrogacy laws. In the paper, ‘Building families through surrogacy: a new law’, we have made a range of provisional proposals and asked a series of questions. The responses that we receive will inform our final recommendations to make surrogacy law fit for the 21st century.

In recent years, surrogacy has become more common. While the exact number of surrogate births that take place each year is not clear, between the mid-2000s and now there appears to have been an approximate ten-fold increase in the number of children born this way. As it has become more popular, the number of calls to reform the system of surrogacy have also increased. The surrogacy project originates from the Law Commission of England and Wales’ Thirteenth Programme of Law Reform and from the Scottish Law Commission’s Tenth Programme of Law Reform.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll