header-logo header-logo

Reforming surrogacy

14 June 2019 / Nick Hopkins
Issue: 7844 / Categories: Opinion , Family
printer mail-detail

Professor Nick Hopkins discusses the Law Commissions’ consultation on surrogacy & what happens next

Earlier this month, the Law Commission of England and Wales and the Scottish Law Commission published our joint consultation paper on reforming surrogacy laws. In the paper, ‘Building families through surrogacy: a new law’, we have made a range of provisional proposals and asked a series of questions. The responses that we receive will inform our final recommendations to make surrogacy law fit for the 21st century.

In recent years, surrogacy has become more common. While the exact number of surrogate births that take place each year is not clear, between the mid-2000s and now there appears to have been an approximate ten-fold increase in the number of children born this way. As it has become more popular, the number of calls to reform the system of surrogacy have also increased. The surrogacy project originates from the Law Commission of England and Wales’ Thirteenth Programme of Law Reform and from the Scottish Law Commission’s Tenth Programme of Law Reform.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll