header-logo header-logo

Regan on Jackson: some predictions on fixed costs

13 July 2017 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7754 / Categories: Opinion , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Fixed costs are a done deal. But when, how & where will they apply? Dominic Regan shares his thoughts

Sir Rupert and his merry band of assessors are bang on target. His report proposing the extension of fixed costs will be delivered right on time at the end of this month. It will go to government. We should all see it shortly afterwards.

Back in January 2016 Jackson stated that the time had come for a drastic extension of fixed costs. This would be lateral, capturing all cases regardless of subject matter. It would be vertical too, as it would apply to claims worth up to £250,000.

The beauty of budgeting

The widespread consultation that subsequently took place has led to a revision of those proposals. Having attended a number of roadshows it is clear that the ceiling will be set at a considerably lower level. A figure of or about £100,000 has been widely mentioned. Do appreciate that where

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll