header-logo header-logo

13 September 2012
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Regulating the referral fees ban

SRA will not provide detailed rules on referral fee ban

Solicitors’ demands for detailed rules to help them comply with the forthcoming ban on referral fees in personal injury cases will not be met, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has confirmed.

The referral fees ban is due to come into force next April, as part of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012. The government is introducing it in response to suggestions that referral fees are encouraging higher numbers of claims and therefore higher insurance premiums.

The SRA intends to use an “outcomes-focused approach” to regulate the ban, which will allow it “to look at the substance of an arrangement, rather than just its form, and focus on those arrangements that pose a real risk to the public interest”.

However, responses to the SRA’s June discussion paper included concerns that the Law Society previously found it difficult to regulate the payment of referral fees and called for “clear guidance” on the ban.

Having published its analysis of the responses last week, the SRA says: “It is not the function of the SRA to provide regulated persons with ‘safe harbour’ guidance.

“However, given the interest in this issue, it is likely that the SRA will publish further guidance setting out our legal interpretation of what is caught by the Act. Our preliminary view is that the definition within the Act is fairly wide-ranging.”

It warns that joint marketing and advertising arrangements are “vulnerable to being in breach”, and says solicitors had raised “particular concerns” about these. It says it will look at the issue “so as to ensure that a clear and consistent message is delivered in the forthcoming months”.

Issue: 7529 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll