header-logo header-logo

Regulating the referral fees ban

13 September 2012
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

SRA will not provide detailed rules on referral fee ban

Solicitors’ demands for detailed rules to help them comply with the forthcoming ban on referral fees in personal injury cases will not be met, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has confirmed.

The referral fees ban is due to come into force next April, as part of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012. The government is introducing it in response to suggestions that referral fees are encouraging higher numbers of claims and therefore higher insurance premiums.

The SRA intends to use an “outcomes-focused approach” to regulate the ban, which will allow it “to look at the substance of an arrangement, rather than just its form, and focus on those arrangements that pose a real risk to the public interest”.

However, responses to the SRA’s June discussion paper included concerns that the Law Society previously found it difficult to regulate the payment of referral fees and called for “clear guidance” on the ban.

Having published its analysis of the responses last week, the SRA says: “It is not the function of the SRA to provide regulated persons with ‘safe harbour’ guidance.

“However, given the interest in this issue, it is likely that the SRA will publish further guidance setting out our legal interpretation of what is caught by the Act. Our preliminary view is that the definition within the Act is fairly wide-ranging.”

It warns that joint marketing and advertising arrangements are “vulnerable to being in breach”, and says solicitors had raised “particular concerns” about these. It says it will look at the issue “so as to ensure that a clear and consistent message is delivered in the forthcoming months”.

Issue: 7529 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll