header-logo header-logo

13 September 2012
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Regulating the referral fees ban

SRA will not provide detailed rules on referral fee ban

Solicitors’ demands for detailed rules to help them comply with the forthcoming ban on referral fees in personal injury cases will not be met, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has confirmed.

The referral fees ban is due to come into force next April, as part of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012. The government is introducing it in response to suggestions that referral fees are encouraging higher numbers of claims and therefore higher insurance premiums.

The SRA intends to use an “outcomes-focused approach” to regulate the ban, which will allow it “to look at the substance of an arrangement, rather than just its form, and focus on those arrangements that pose a real risk to the public interest”.

However, responses to the SRA’s June discussion paper included concerns that the Law Society previously found it difficult to regulate the payment of referral fees and called for “clear guidance” on the ban.

Having published its analysis of the responses last week, the SRA says: “It is not the function of the SRA to provide regulated persons with ‘safe harbour’ guidance.

“However, given the interest in this issue, it is likely that the SRA will publish further guidance setting out our legal interpretation of what is caught by the Act. Our preliminary view is that the definition within the Act is fairly wide-ranging.”

It warns that joint marketing and advertising arrangements are “vulnerable to being in breach”, and says solicitors had raised “particular concerns” about these. It says it will look at the issue “so as to ensure that a clear and consistent message is delivered in the forthcoming months”.

Issue: 7529 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

Shakespeare Martineau—Serena Eddy

Shakespeare Martineau—Serena Eddy

London restructuring team strengthened by legal director appointment

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll