header-logo header-logo

Religious dress: human rights & discrimination

13 January 2021 / John Bowers KC
Issue: 7916 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Discrimination
printer mail-detail
35704
John Bowers QC examines the interaction between freedom of religion & discrimination in recent caselaw
  • In the discrimination law of the EU and the domestic law on which it is based, issues around religious dress arise most frequently as indirect discrimination.
  • Part 1 examines the background and early caselaw on the subject.

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has frequently emphasised that freedom of religion under Art 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is ‘one of the foundations of a “democratic society”... [and] one of the most vital elements that go to make up the identity of believers and of their conception of life’ (Kokkinakis v Greece (1993) 17 EHRR 397, para [31]). In Australia, Mason ACJ said in Church of The New Faith v Commissioner For Pay-Roll Tax 1982 154 CLR 120: ‘Freedom of religion is the paradigm and freedom of conscience is the essence of a free society.’

It is instructive to see whether these ample assertions are borne out

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll