header-logo header-logo

23 April 2020
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Costs , Profession
printer mail-detail

Remote hearings: guidance on costs

Costs lawyers have produced guidance on assessing costs for remote hearings, with the support of the regional costs bench

The guidance, which has also been welcomed by the masters at the Senior Court Costs Office, is available on the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) website, at: www.associationofcostslawyers.co.uk/Remote-Hearings---Guidance.

Claire Green, chair of the ACL, said: ‘Having taken part in a two-hour oral review of a provisional assessment this week, and organising it without the benefit of any guidance, I can only say that this document is to be welcomed.

‘We would urge all practitioners to familiarise themselves with it as it is anticipated the judges will begin to utilise the guidance quickly.’

The guidance pays particular attention to preparing e-bundles, with specific instruction on how to maintain privilege over the receiving party’s file of papers whilst at the same time creating an accessible core bundle, and how to deal with requests for Pamplin production. Courts must be provided with an e-bill in an editable format, such as Excel.

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Costs , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll