header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 October 2021 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7951 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Remote legal advice in police stations

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
60023
Michael Zander QC on a vexed current issue
  • Version 4 of the Joint Interview Interim Protocol took effect on 4 October 2021.

The pandemic created a serious problem regarding in person legal advice in the police station. Solicitors were understandably concerned about the health risks to their staff. The situation was met by a concordat (Joint Interview Interim Protocol (JIIP)) agreed by the National Police Chiefs Council, the Crown Prosecution Service, the Law Society, the Criminal Law Society Association and the London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association.

The Protocol has had four iterations. The fourth took effect as from 4 October 2021.

Version 1 of the Protocol (March 2020) said that solicitors/legal representatives would attend some interviews ‘due to the serious nature of the case’. It included a provision that written statements under caution developed with the benefit of legal advice could be used instead of interviews.

Version 2 of the Protocol (April 2020), after representations by the National Appropriate Adult Network, required that the police assess a child’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Partner joins residential real estate team

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Social housing team announces partner appointment

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: 40 years on, has PACE lost its edge?
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
NLJ this week: Stress-testing the City
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
NLJ this week: How sure is ‘sure’ enough?
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
NLJ this week: A deferred prosecution reprieve
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
NLJ this week: Mandelson, Epstein & the court of popular opinion
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll