header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 October 2021 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7951 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Remote legal advice in police stations

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
60023
Michael Zander QC on a vexed current issue
  • Version 4 of the Joint Interview Interim Protocol took effect on 4 October 2021.

The pandemic created a serious problem regarding in person legal advice in the police station. Solicitors were understandably concerned about the health risks to their staff. The situation was met by a concordat (Joint Interview Interim Protocol (JIIP)) agreed by the National Police Chiefs Council, the Crown Prosecution Service, the Law Society, the Criminal Law Society Association and the London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association.

The Protocol has had four iterations. The fourth took effect as from 4 October 2021.

Version 1 of the Protocol (March 2020) said that solicitors/legal representatives would attend some interviews ‘due to the serious nature of the case’. It included a provision that written statements under caution developed with the benefit of legal advice could be used instead of interviews.

Version 2 of the Protocol (April 2020), after representations by the National Appropriate Adult Network, required that the police assess a child’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: CPR tweak closes third-party disclosure gap
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
NLJ this week: Court of Appeals wrestles with Mazur fallout
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
NLJ this week: Appeal court reins in ‘wrong defendant’ switcheroo

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll