header-logo header-logo

18 November 2016 / Tamsin Cox , Julia Petrenko
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

In residence

nlj_7723_petrenko

Tamsin Cox & Julia Petrenko examine a useful authority for freeholders of residential buildings in relation to Airbnb

  • Risks of letting property on Airbnb.
  • Upper Tribunal clarifies meaning of “residence”.

Over 40,000 properties in London are listed on Airbnb: a website which allows home owners to list their property, or a room in it, as short term accommodation for tourists or other visitors. That number is growing year on year as more and more Londoners seek to make extra money from their underutilised space, and more and more visitors seek to avoid the costs of hotels. There are however potential legal difficulties, one of which was considered by the Upper Tribunal in Nemcova v Fairfield Rents Ltd [2016] UKUT 30 (IAC), [2016] All ER (D) 130 (Jan).

Facts of the case

Ms Nemcova was the long leasehold owner of a flat which she let on Airbnb. Pursuant to the lease, Nemcova covenanted not to use the property or permit it to be used for any illegal or immoral purpose or for any purpose whatsoever

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
back-to-top-scroll