header-logo header-logo

Restrictive covenants: what’s reasonable?

17 June 2022 / Catherine Taskis , Michael Ranson
Issue: 7983 / Categories: Features , Property , Public
printer mail-detail
84925
Catherine Taskis QC & Michael Ranson explore key public law principles of reasonableness for property practitioners
  • Davies-Gilbert v Goacher is a recent High Court authority which should help to guide property practitioners through the minefield of reasonableness in the context of refusal of consent under restrictive covenants.

Restrictive covenant disputes are often a particularly bitter type of neighbour dispute.

Restrictive covenants affect landowners, both urban and rural, up and down the country. In practice, it is relatively rare to see a Land Registry title with no covenants on it and for every plot of land burdened there ought, at least in theory, to be a plot of land which benefits. Given that the benefitting and burdened land should be near to each other, a dispute about a covenant will invariably also be a dispute between neighbours. This can have the effect of turning what might at first appear to be a dry legal dispute about old drafting into something where passions can run high.

Disputes about qualified covenants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll