header-logo header-logo

17 June 2022 / Catherine Taskis , Michael Ranson
Issue: 7983 / Categories: Features , Property , Public
printer mail-detail

Restrictive covenants: what’s reasonable?

84925
Catherine Taskis QC & Michael Ranson explore key public law principles of reasonableness for property practitioners
  • Davies-Gilbert v Goacher is a recent High Court authority which should help to guide property practitioners through the minefield of reasonableness in the context of refusal of consent under restrictive covenants.

Restrictive covenant disputes are often a particularly bitter type of neighbour dispute.

Restrictive covenants affect landowners, both urban and rural, up and down the country. In practice, it is relatively rare to see a Land Registry title with no covenants on it and for every plot of land burdened there ought, at least in theory, to be a plot of land which benefits. Given that the benefitting and burdened land should be near to each other, a dispute about a covenant will invariably also be a dispute between neighbours. This can have the effect of turning what might at first appear to be a dry legal dispute about old drafting into something where passions can run high.

Disputes about qualified covenants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll