header-logo header-logo

Restrictive covenants: what’s reasonable?

17 June 2022 / Catherine Taskis , Michael Ranson
Issue: 7983 / Categories: Features , Property , Public
printer mail-detail
84925
Catherine Taskis QC & Michael Ranson explore key public law principles of reasonableness for property practitioners
  • Davies-Gilbert v Goacher is a recent High Court authority which should help to guide property practitioners through the minefield of reasonableness in the context of refusal of consent under restrictive covenants.

Restrictive covenant disputes are often a particularly bitter type of neighbour dispute.

Restrictive covenants affect landowners, both urban and rural, up and down the country. In practice, it is relatively rare to see a Land Registry title with no covenants on it and for every plot of land burdened there ought, at least in theory, to be a plot of land which benefits. Given that the benefitting and burdened land should be near to each other, a dispute about a covenant will invariably also be a dispute between neighbours. This can have the effect of turning what might at first appear to be a dry legal dispute about old drafting into something where passions can run high.

Disputes about qualified covenants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mike Wilson, Blake Morgan

NLJ Career Profile: Mike Wilson, Blake Morgan

Mike Wilson, managing partner of Blake Morgan chair of the CBI’s South-East Council, reflects on his career the challenges that have defined him

Clarke Willmott—Alexandria Kittlety

Clarke Willmott—Alexandria Kittlety

Partner joins commercial property team in Birmingham

Birketts—Will MacFarlane & Sarah Dodds

Birketts—Will MacFarlane & Sarah Dodds

Family team expands with double appointment in Bristol office

NEWS
Lawyers have expressed dismay at the Chancellor Rachel Reeve’s decision to impose a £2,000 cap on salary sacrifice contributions
NLJ is inviting its readers to take part in this year’s annual reader research, a short survey designed to help shape the future direction of the magazine. The questionnaire consists of just eight quick questions and offers an opportunity for legal professionals to share their views on the content, coverage and issues that matter most to them.
The Law Society has urged regulators not to ban the term ‘no win no fee’, as the profession contemplates measures to prevent a disaster like the SSB Group collapse from happening again
The legal profession's leaders have mounted a robust defence of trial by jury, following reports that Justice Secretary David Lammy is considering restricting it to rape, murder, manslaughter and other cases that are in the public interest
CILEX (the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives) has been granted permission to appeal Mazur, a decision which has caused consternation among litigation firms
back-to-top-scroll