header-logo header-logo

17 June 2022 / Catherine Taskis , Michael Ranson
Issue: 7983 / Categories: Features , Property , Public
printer mail-detail

Restrictive covenants: what’s reasonable?

84925
Catherine Taskis QC & Michael Ranson explore key public law principles of reasonableness for property practitioners
  • Davies-Gilbert v Goacher is a recent High Court authority which should help to guide property practitioners through the minefield of reasonableness in the context of refusal of consent under restrictive covenants.

Restrictive covenant disputes are often a particularly bitter type of neighbour dispute.

Restrictive covenants affect landowners, both urban and rural, up and down the country. In practice, it is relatively rare to see a Land Registry title with no covenants on it and for every plot of land burdened there ought, at least in theory, to be a plot of land which benefits. Given that the benefitting and burdened land should be near to each other, a dispute about a covenant will invariably also be a dispute between neighbours. This can have the effect of turning what might at first appear to be a dry legal dispute about old drafting into something where passions can run high.

Disputes about qualified covenants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll