header-logo header-logo

14 June 2023
Issue: 8029 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Retained EU law ping pong continues

MPs have rejected two of the remaining Lords amendments to the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill, in the latest stage of the ‘ping pong’ process.

Debating the Bill in the House of Commons this week, MPs voted down amendment 15B, ensuring any changes to retained EU law do not dilute environmental protection or breach international agreements, and 42B, ensuring revocation or replacement of secondary retained EU law must first be considered by a sifting committee of MPs. They agreed to an amendment on reporting requirements and approved the appointment of a committee to draw up reasons for rejecting the remaining Lords amendments.

Once both Houses agree on the final text, the Bill can receive Royal Assent. The MPs noted that neither the Senedd Cymru nor the Scottish Parliament has given legislative consent.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll