header-logo header-logo

Revisiting misconduct in public office (Pt 2)

26 March 2021 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 7926 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail
43910
Simon Parsons hails the Law Commission’s proposed reforms to the misconduct in public office offence
  • Reform proposals would give a clear distinction between public office offences and other offences such as manslaughter and theft/fraud.

In the first article on the Law Commission’s report ‘Misconduct in Public Office’ (Law Com no 397), it was noted that the Law Commission recommended that this common law offence should be abolished (see ‘Revisiting misconduct in public office’, NLJ, 19 March 2021). However, the report does not recommend abolition without replacement, because that would potentially encourage or facilitate corruption and dereliction of public duty which could undermine confidence in government and public services. In addition, there are five situations listed in the report where no other offence may be available, or would be inadequate to address the criminality (pp39–40, para 3.49); for example, the neglect of duty leading to serious harm, to individuals and to the public interest such as a child safety officer failing to perform basic checks leading to damaging

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll