header-logo header-logo

26 March 2021 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 7926 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Revisiting misconduct in public office (Pt 2)

43910
Simon Parsons hails the Law Commission’s proposed reforms to the misconduct in public office offence
  • Reform proposals would give a clear distinction between public office offences and other offences such as manslaughter and theft/fraud.

In the first article on the Law Commission’s report ‘Misconduct in Public Office’ (Law Com no 397), it was noted that the Law Commission recommended that this common law offence should be abolished (see ‘Revisiting misconduct in public office’, NLJ, 19 March 2021). However, the report does not recommend abolition without replacement, because that would potentially encourage or facilitate corruption and dereliction of public duty which could undermine confidence in government and public services. In addition, there are five situations listed in the report where no other offence may be available, or would be inadequate to address the criminality (pp39–40, para 3.49); for example, the neglect of duty leading to serious harm, to individuals and to the public interest such as a child safety officer failing to perform basic checks leading to damaging

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll