header-logo header-logo

Revisiting misconduct in public office (Pt 2)

26 March 2021 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 7926 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail
43910
Simon Parsons hails the Law Commission’s proposed reforms to the misconduct in public office offence
  • Reform proposals would give a clear distinction between public office offences and other offences such as manslaughter and theft/fraud.

In the first article on the Law Commission’s report ‘Misconduct in Public Office’ (Law Com no 397), it was noted that the Law Commission recommended that this common law offence should be abolished (see ‘Revisiting misconduct in public office’, NLJ, 19 March 2021). However, the report does not recommend abolition without replacement, because that would potentially encourage or facilitate corruption and dereliction of public duty which could undermine confidence in government and public services. In addition, there are five situations listed in the report where no other offence may be available, or would be inadequate to address the criminality (pp39–40, para 3.49); for example, the neglect of duty leading to serious harm, to individuals and to the public interest such as a child safety officer failing to perform basic checks leading to damaging

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll