header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
23 November 2012 / Louis Flannery KC
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Rich pickings (Pt I)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Louis Flannery analyses the latest saga in the oligarch wars taking place in the English courts

As a story, the case of Berezovsky v Abramovich had everything: sex; money; politics; power; mysterious deaths; shady deals in a top London hotel; corruption; and betrayal. As a legal battle, it also had everything: billions of dollars at stake; a massive trial, stretching over the best part of six months; stellar counsel, playing at the top of their game; legal fees said to have reached over £100m in total; a judge regarded as one of the best on the bench, and widely tipped for promotion; lying witnesses; and a good old-fashioned fight between two mightily rich men. Throw in a decent mix of legal issues and you have the dream court case.

Background: the end of Communism in Russia

The story really begins in the late 1980s and 1990s: a period of extraordinary upheaval in Russian history. During this period—as Russia ceased to be part of the Soviet Union—the political system, the centralised economy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll