header-logo header-logo

23 November 2012 / Louis Flannery KC
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Rich pickings (Pt I)

Louis Flannery analyses the latest saga in the oligarch wars taking place in the English courts

As a story, the case of Berezovsky v Abramovich had everything: sex; money; politics; power; mysterious deaths; shady deals in a top London hotel; corruption; and betrayal. As a legal battle, it also had everything: billions of dollars at stake; a massive trial, stretching over the best part of six months; stellar counsel, playing at the top of their game; legal fees said to have reached over £100m in total; a judge regarded as one of the best on the bench, and widely tipped for promotion; lying witnesses; and a good old-fashioned fight between two mightily rich men. Throw in a decent mix of legal issues and you have the dream court case.

Background: the end of Communism in Russia

The story really begins in the late 1980s and 1990s: a period of extraordinary upheaval in Russian history. During this period—as Russia ceased to be part of the Soviet Union—the political system, the centralised economy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll