header-logo header-logo

The Right to choose not to

03 January 2008 / Juliet Carp
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Should employees be punished for standing up for their views? Juliet Carp reports

Employees complain about all sorts of things: hours, clothes, food, customers, even colleagues with a different background, lifestyle or opinion. Generally, an employee must comply with his employer's instructions. If the employee refuses to do so, his employer might find a way to accommodate him. If this is impractical, or the employer is unwilling to help, it could respond by instigating disciplinary proceedings, leading to a warning or dismissal. Less formal reactions from managers or colleague might include verbal abuse, a smaller bonus or a lost promotion. The employment protection available to objectors depends on the work they are expected to do, the reasons for objection and the employer’s response. Andrew McClintock, a justice of the peace who objected to the possibility that he might be required to place children with same sex couples, claimed that he had been discriminated against contrary to the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief ) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1660) (the regulations). On 31

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll