header-logo header-logo

10 July 2008
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Right to sue

In brief

A pensioner who was raped by Lotto winner Iorworth Hoare 20 years ago has won the right to sue him for a share of his £7.2m winnings. Former teacher, Mrs A, did not sue Hoare at the time of the rape because he was broke. The High Court and the Court of Appeal threw out her bid for compensation made after Hoare hit the jackpot in 2004 because her civil suit was outside the limitation period. However, the House of Lords referred the case back to the High Court which has now affirmed that Mrs A can claim compensation. Mr Justice Coulson said the factors supporting Mrs A’s case were “more numerous and of significantly greater weight” than those offered by Hoare’s lawyers. A hearing will now be set to assess the level of damages Mrs A receives.

Issue: 7329 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll