header-logo header-logo

Healthcare workers: right to protest?

222351
Amy Woolfson analyses the legal position of healthcare professionals who take part in climate activism
  • Climate activism by healthcare professionals, including peaceful but unlawful protest, can trigger regulatory scrutiny, especially when it results in criminal convictions or findings of contempt of court.
  • Regulatory responses vary. While some convictions lead to sanction, others may not even reach a tribunal.
  • Protestors who express intent to continue breaking the law may face extended or escalated sanction.

The impact of climate change on health is real. For example, research published in May 2025 by Climate Central found that extreme heat, which is becoming more frequent and intense because of climate change, has had significant adverse impact on pregnant women and their babies, including a rise in preterm births.

Climate change impacts the health service: the ageing NHS estate is ill-equipped to deal with extreme weather. The record-breaking heat in summer 2022 led to cancelled operations, staff and bed shortages, and hospital overheating. It is understandable that many medical professionals,

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll