header-logo header-logo

On the right track?

04 September 2014 / Sue Nash
Issue: 7620 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail
right-track_nash

Costs lawyers are in demand following the Jackson shake-up, but there is no room for complacency, says Sue Nash

More than a year on and the impact of the Jackson reforms on litigation in England and Wales is starting to push law firms into making significant changes to their working practices. Most firms continue to work on large caseloads taken on prior to their 1 April 2013 introduction, and while we have not quite seen the “big bang” predicted by many, what is evident is the significant evolution happening in the way cases are run.

The Association of Costs Lawyers’ (ACL) annual survey of members gives a real insight into the world of post-Jackson litigation and the consequences of the new budgetary regime.

Most striking for costs lawyers has been the significant rise in demand for their specialist skills. Some 59% of those surveyed said the reforms have led them to expand their practices, with half taking on new staff as a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll