header-logo header-logo

24 April 2008 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

The right to wear a turban

Geoffrey Bindman reviews an old case that has recently become topical

This year is the 25th anniversary of the decision of the House of Lords in Mandla v Dowell-Lee [1983] 1 All ER 1062, in which a Sikh schoolboy was refused admission to a private preparatory school because he would not remove the turban. The Lords reversed a decision of the Court of Appeal and held that Sikhs were entitled to the protection of the Race Relations Act 1976 (RRA 1976).

This judgment was recently commemorated at the annual conference of the Metropolitan Police Sikh Association in the presence of the boy, Gurinder and his father, Sewa Singh Mandla. Fortunately, Gurinder suffered no lasting ill-effects: another school was quickly found for him where there was no objection to his traditional headdress. Now in his thirties, he is a partner in the solicitors' firm founded by his father in .

RRA 1976 prohibits discrimination on grounds of colour,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll