header-logo header-logo

20 January 2012 / Jack Harris
Issue: 7497 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Rights & wrongs

istock_000005382953large_4

Drivers should exercise extreme caution when turning right, warns Jack Harris

 

Road traffic accidents have for some time formed the factual basis of a significant proportion of personal injury claims, and will no doubt continue to do so. In many cases, the key battleground between the parties is the standard of the duty of care to be imposed on the defendant driver: in short, what would a reasonable driver have done? Several recent cases have sought to clarify the standard of driving to be expected of a driver in a potentially thorny scenario: when carrying out a right hand turn.

Turning right is an inherently dangerous manoeuvre, in that it involves a vehicle driving across the carriageway reserved for oncoming traffic. It also involves a risk of colliding with a vehicle using that carriageway for an overtaking manoeuvre. A driver will face the task of turning right in two main situations: 
  • when turning off a major road onto a minor road situated on the right; and 
  • when turning right from a
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll