header-logo header-logo

05 June 2008 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7324 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Risking a shameful betrayal

The government needs to practise what it preaches on torture, says Geoffrey Bindman

The Torture (Damages) Bill, introduced by Lord Archer of Sandwell, a former solicitor general and president of Amnesty International, was given a second reading in the House of Lords on 16 May. It will now go to a committee for detailed examination and, unless blocked by the government, will move to the Commons and eventually become law. It is a private member's Bill strongly supported by other peers including the former Lord Chief Justice Lord Woolf. The only opposition in the debate came from the government minister, Lord Hunt. It would be a tragedy if the government procured the defeat of this humane measure. It is a vital step in the international struggle to end torture by providing its victims with the means of obtaining redress through the courts.

The United Nations Convention against Torture and other Cruel or Degrading Treatment, ratified by the UK and over 100 other countries, condemns torture as an international crime of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Payne Hicks Beach—Flora Hussey

Payne Hicks Beach—Flora Hussey

Private client department announces partner hire

Blake Morgan—Daniela Smith & Lee Fisher

Blake Morgan—Daniela Smith & Lee Fisher

Firm appoints first joint heads of Wales office

Ogier—Heidi Sandy & Farrah Sbaiti

Ogier—Heidi Sandy & Farrah Sbaiti

Global dispute resolution team promotes two partners in Guernsey and Cayman Islands

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll