header-logo header-logo

Risky business

29 October 2010 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7439 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter report on how employers should deal with allegations of criminal misconduct

An employer faced with misconduct committed by its employee either inside the workplace or outside of it, where the misconduct complained of could amount to a criminal offence, is faced with a tricky series of considerations when deciding how to conduct any disciplinary procedure.

The ACAS Guide: Disciplinary and Grievances at Work 2009 makes it clear that conviction for, or being charged with, a criminal offence, is not in and of itself grounds for dismissal. However such conduct by the employee has important ramifications for employers and the procedures that they may wish to adopt when considering or conducting a disciplinary procedure.

The first matter that an employer must consider is to assess the nature of the conduct: does it impact upon the claimant’s employment? If it is clear that this is not the case, then there is a good likelihood that the employer will not properly be able to conduct a disciplinary investigation. Impact on the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll