header-logo header-logo

Risky business

29 October 2010 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7439 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter report on how employers should deal with allegations of criminal misconduct

An employer faced with misconduct committed by its employee either inside the workplace or outside of it, where the misconduct complained of could amount to a criminal offence, is faced with a tricky series of considerations when deciding how to conduct any disciplinary procedure.

The ACAS Guide: Disciplinary and Grievances at Work 2009 makes it clear that conviction for, or being charged with, a criminal offence, is not in and of itself grounds for dismissal. However such conduct by the employee has important ramifications for employers and the procedures that they may wish to adopt when considering or conducting a disciplinary procedure.

The first matter that an employer must consider is to assess the nature of the conduct: does it impact upon the claimant’s employment? If it is clear that this is not the case, then there is a good likelihood that the employer will not properly be able to conduct a disciplinary investigation. Impact on the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll