header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 June 2018 / Jonathan Newbold , Marlene Henderson
Issue: 7798 / Categories: Features , Insurance surgery , Insurance / reinsurance , Criminal , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Risky business

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7798_henderson

As a result of the Criminal Finances Act 2017, there are new risks for directors and officers and their insurers. Jonathan Newbold & Marlene Henderson investigate.

The recent implementation of the Criminal Finances Act 2017 (CFA) marks the latest legislative crackdown on corporate financial crimes. The CFA has extended the powers of law enforcement agencies to recover the proceeds of crime (including tax evasion, money laundering and terrorist financing) and introduced a strict corporate accountability. The additional scrutiny on corporations and their senior management team is likely to have a knock on effect for D&O policy holders and their insurers.

Criminal Finances Act – what is it?

The CFA, which came into force on 30 September 2017, is fine tuning the approach towards financial crime and extending the powers set out in the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. The driving force behind the CFA was growing concern about levels of tax evasion and a lack of accountability by senior management.

What does the Criminal Finances Act 2017 cover?

In short, and most significantly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll