header-logo header-logo

04 November 2010 / Joseph Ollech , Adam Rosenthal
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

The road to recovery

Adam Rosenthal & Joseph Ollech report on elephant traps, technical gymnastics & compliance

In Woodar Investment Development Limited v Wimpey Construction UK Limited [1980] 1 WLR 277, a contract for the sale of development land contained a special condition entitling the purchaser to terminate the contract if, prior to the completion date, the property to be sold became subject to compulsory purchase by an acquiring authority. In due course, the purchasers gave such a notice. The vendors disputed it and it was found that the notice was invalid. However, the vendors then purported to accept the purchasers’ repudiatory breach of contract and sue for damages. The House of Lords (by a 3:2 majority) held that the purchasers, in serving an invalid notice of termination, were not manifesting the intention not to perform the contract and therefore the invalid notice of rescission was not, itself, a repudiatory breach of contract.

The principle that an attempt to terminate a contract, relying on the very terms of the contract, if found to be wrongful

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll