header-logo header-logo

04 November 2010 / Joseph Ollech , Adam Rosenthal
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

The road to recovery

Adam Rosenthal & Joseph Ollech report on elephant traps, technical gymnastics & compliance

In Woodar Investment Development Limited v Wimpey Construction UK Limited [1980] 1 WLR 277, a contract for the sale of development land contained a special condition entitling the purchaser to terminate the contract if, prior to the completion date, the property to be sold became subject to compulsory purchase by an acquiring authority. In due course, the purchasers gave such a notice. The vendors disputed it and it was found that the notice was invalid. However, the vendors then purported to accept the purchasers’ repudiatory breach of contract and sue for damages. The House of Lords (by a 3:2 majority) held that the purchasers, in serving an invalid notice of termination, were not manifesting the intention not to perform the contract and therefore the invalid notice of rescission was not, itself, a repudiatory breach of contract.

The principle that an attempt to terminate a contract, relying on the very terms of the contract, if found to be wrongful

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll