header-logo header-logo

19 September 2025 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 8131 / Categories: Opinion , Rule of law , International , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Rule of law: beyond the rhetoric

230097
Despite talking the talk on the rule of law, the government must also walk the walk if it is to confront threats both nationally & internationally, writes Simon Parsons

The ‘rule of law’ is not just a strapline; it is absolutely necessary both nationally and internationally, as without it ‘poor Liberty lies fetter’d… like a flie in the Cob-web’ (Mercurius Pragmaticus, 1649).

This rhetoric on the importance of the rule of law has a long history—for example, in the Case of Proclamations [1610] 1 WLUK 362 (KB), Lord Coke asserted that the king did not have the power to ‘change the common law, nor create any offence, by his proclamation, which was not an offence before, without Parliament’. In fact, this was quiet rhetoric, because the Proclamations was not a ‘case’ but rather private musings by Coke which he dared not publish in his lifetime, as he wanted to appear as a respectable 17th century gentleman and not a revolutionary.

In more recent years, at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll