header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
29 July 2022 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7989 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Rules? What rules? The non-compliant expert

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
89130
Experts must comply with the fundamental duty to assist the court, says Mark Solon
  • A look at the recent case of Pal v Damen and another, where the claim was for clinical negligence arising from an operation.
  • Master David Cook said the expert’s report lacked substance and did not comply with the CPR.

As well as being an expert in a particular field, following the rules of how to act as an expert is essential. An expert who failed to follow even the basic requirements of the Civil Procedure Rules Part 35 did not impress Master David Cook in Pal v Damen and another [2022] EWHC 4697 (QB). The decision reiterates the need for experts to follow the required form of a court compliant report. The report can indicate if an expert has complied with the fundamental duty to assist the court and consequentially the weight given to the opinion proffered.

The claimant brought an action for clinical negligence arising from an operation conducted in Belgium. The defendants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
NLJ this week: Diamond rings and broken promises

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: The battle over medical report fees intensifies
Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll