header-logo header-logo

Ryan Beckwith appeal ruling 'significant'

30 November 2020
Issue: 7913 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail
Former Magic Circle partner Ryan Beckwith’s successful appeal against a finding of misconduct has clarified the extent to which professional regulators can reach into a lawyer’s private life

In a ruling last week, in Beckwith v Solicitors Regulation Authority [2020] EWHC 3231 (Admin), the High Court overturned the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal’s ruling that Beckwith failed to act with integrity and brought the profession into disrepute.

The claims against the former Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer insurance partner concerned alleged sexual activity in July 2016 with a junior female colleague who was ‘heavily intoxicated to the extent that she was vulnerable and/or her judgment and decision-making ability was impaired’. Beckwith was alleged to have breached Principles 2 and 6 of the SRA Handbook.

However, the President of the Queen’s Bench Division and Mr Justice Swift held: ‘Principle 2 or Principle 6 may reach into private life only when conduct that is part of a person's private life realistically touches on her practise of the profession…or the standing of the profession…Any such conduct must be qualitatively relevant.’

They warned: ‘Regulators will do well to recognise that it is all too easy to be dogmatic without knowing it; popular outcry is not proof that a particular set of events gives rise to any matter falling within a regulator's remit.’

They quashed the tribunal’s order that Beckwith pay a fine of £35,000 and set aside the ‘alarming’ £200,000 costs order.

John Gould, partner, Russell-Cooke, said: ‘This is a very significant judgment not just for the approach to inappropriate behaviour outside of practice but also more generally.

‘It lets air into a longstanding conceptual vacuum in which identifying what should properly concern regulators is obscured by popular outcry and circular concepts such as undermining public confidence. It pulls the assessment of conduct back to seriousness and demonstrable relevance to practice. 

‘Abuse of power is relevant but simply behaving “inappropriately” is not. Misconduct must be referrable to the rule book not to the free-floating views of regulators or tribunals. The conceptual framework is not finished but this is a solid start.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Rachael Chapman

Muckle LLP—Rachael Chapman

Sports, education and charities practice welcomes senior associate

Ellisons—Carla Jones

Ellisons—Carla Jones

Partner and head of commercial litigation joins in Chelmsford

Freeths—Louise Mahon

Freeths—Louise Mahon

Firm strengthens Glasgow corporate practice with partner hire

NEWS
One in five in-house lawyers suffer ‘high’ or ‘severe’ work-related stress, according to a report by global legal body, the Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC)
The Legal Ombudsman’s (LeO’s) plea for a budget increase has been rejected by the Law Society and accepted only ‘with reluctance’ by conveyancers
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
back-to-top-scroll