header-logo header-logo

14 February 2014 / Kate Harris
Issue: 7594 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Sad times

Is grief enough to invalidate a will, asks Kate Harris

In December 2013, the High Court handed down judgment in a will dispute case and provided useful guidance as to when a testator’s grief will amount to a lack of testamentary capacity (see Dharamshi & Others v Velji & Others [2013] EWHC 3917 (Ch)).

 

Dramatis personae

The claimants in this case were the blood relatives of the testator and the beneficiaries under his last will dated 25 June 2003 (“the June will”). There were two earlier wills dated 11 April 2003 and 1 May 2003 under which the testator’s wife was the principal beneficiary. In the event of his wife predeceasing him, the April and May wills left the entire estate to his wife’s family, the first to third defendants (“the defendants”). The testator’s wife died on 27 May 2003 and he promptly executed the June will, leaving his entire estate to the claimants.

The claimants invited the court to pronounce in favour of the June will. The defendants disputed the validity of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll