header-logo header-logo

14 February 2014 / Kate Harris
Issue: 7594 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Sad times

Is grief enough to invalidate a will, asks Kate Harris

In December 2013, the High Court handed down judgment in a will dispute case and provided useful guidance as to when a testator’s grief will amount to a lack of testamentary capacity (see Dharamshi & Others v Velji & Others [2013] EWHC 3917 (Ch)).

 

Dramatis personae

The claimants in this case were the blood relatives of the testator and the beneficiaries under his last will dated 25 June 2003 (“the June will”). There were two earlier wills dated 11 April 2003 and 1 May 2003 under which the testator’s wife was the principal beneficiary. In the event of his wife predeceasing him, the April and May wills left the entire estate to his wife’s family, the first to third defendants (“the defendants”). The testator’s wife died on 27 May 2003 and he promptly executed the June will, leaving his entire estate to the claimants.

The claimants invited the court to pronounce in favour of the June will. The defendants disputed the validity of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
back-to-top-scroll